The Stakeholder Presentation Paper
The Stakeholder Presentation Paper
For this assessment you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment.
As a current or future nurse leader, you may be called upon to present to stakeholders and leadership about projects that you have been involved in or wish to implement. The ability to communicate a plan—and potential implications of not pursuing such a plan—to stakeholders effectively can be critically important in creating awareness and buy-in, as well as building your personal and professional brand in your organization. It is equally important that you know how to create compelling presentations for others’ delivery and ensure that they convey the same content you would deliver if you were the presenter The Stakeholder Presentation Paper.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
You are encouraged to complete the Evidence-Based Practice: Basics and Guidelines activity before you develop the presentation. This activity consists of six questions that will create the opportunity to check your understanding of the fundamentals of evidence-based practice as well as ways to identify EBP in practice. The information gained from completing this formative will help promote success in the Stakeholder Presentation and demonstrate courseroom engagement—it requires just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.
Demonstration of Proficiency
- Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
-
- Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
<li”>Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes The Stakeholder Presentation Paper
-
- Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
- Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
-
- Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
- Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
- Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
-
- Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.
- Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors.
Professional Context
This assessment will provide you with an opportunity to sharpen your ability to create a professional presentation to stakeholders. In this presentation, you will explain the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle and how it can be used to introduce the plan (P), implement the plan (D), study the effectiveness of the plan (S), and act on what is learned (A) to drive continuous improvement. By using this cycle, the stakeholders will have a tool and a proposal to expand on these ideas to drive workplace change and create improved processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem. The Stakeholder Presentation Paper
Scenario
In addition to summarizing the key points of Assessments 2 and 3, you will provide stakeholders and/or leadership with an overview of project specifics as well as how success would be evaluated—you will essentially be presenting a discussion of the Plan, Do, and Study parts of the PDSA cycle. Again, you will not be expected to execute the project, so you will not have any results to study. However, by carefully examining the ways in which your plan could be carried out and evaluated, you will get some of the experience of the thinking required for PDSA.
When creating your PowerPoint for this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the target audience: your interviewee’s organizational leadership. The overall goal of this assessment is to create a presentation that your interviewee could potentially give in his or her organization.
Instructions
Please follow the Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]. If you need technical information on using PowerPoint, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations.
Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score The Stakeholder Presentation Paper.
- Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
- Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
- Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
- Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
- Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and respectful with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example: The Stakeholder Presentation Paper
- Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.
-
- What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve?
- Why should the audience care about solving it?
- Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.
-
- Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue?
- How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal?
- Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.
-
- What is the objective?
- How likely is it to work?
- What will the interdisciplinary team do?
- Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.
-
- How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources?
- How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted?
- How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?
- Part 5: Evaluation.
-
- What would a successful outcome of the project look like?
- What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success?
-
-
- How could this be used to show the degree of success? The Stakeholder Presentation Paper
-
Again, keep in mind that your audience for this presentation is a specific group (or groups) at your interviewee’s organization and tailor your language and messaging accordingly. Remember, also, that another person will ultimately be giving the presentation. Include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide.
Additional Requirements
- Number of slides: Plan on using one or two slides for each part of your presentation as needed, so the content of your presentation will be 8–12 slides in length. Remember that slides should contain concise talking points, and you will use presenter’s notes to go into detail. Be sure to include a reference slide as the last slide of your presentation.
- Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old.
- APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and in your notes pages and reference slide reflect current APA Style and Format.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course The Stakeholder Presentation Paper.
ORDER HERE
Stakeholder Presentation Scoring Guide
CRITERIA | NON-PERFORMANCE | BASIC | PROFICIENT | DISTINGUISHED |
Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. | Does not describe an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. | Describes an organizational or patient issue but the way in which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal is unclear or missing. | Explains an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. | Explains an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal, noting potential consequences of not addressing the issue. |
Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. | Does not summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. | Discusses an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan, but its relevance to an organizational or patient issue is unclear. | Summarizes an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. | Summarizes an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue, noting specific sources of evidence used to develop the plan. |
Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. | Does not explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. | Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented or how the human and financial resources would be managed, but not both. | Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. | Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed, providing real-world examples relevant to the context of the health care organization. |
Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Does not propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Proposes irrelevant criteria or criteria not based in evidence to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Proposes evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. | Proposes evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal, noting specific sources of evidence used to develop the criteria. |
Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. | Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No speaker notes provided. | Slides are easy to read with few editing errors. Speaker notes are sufficient to support the slides. | Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. | Slides are easy to read and clutter free. Slide background is “visually” pleasing with a contrasting color for the text and may utilize graphics. Detailed speaker notes are provided. |
Organize content with clear purpose /goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors. | Does not organize content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides do not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations. Sources are not relevant and/or evidence-based (published within 5 years). No reference list provided. | Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with a reference list not in APA format/or has many errors in format. | Organizes content with clear purpose /goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors. | Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with a flawless APA formatted reference list. |
Resources: Leadership
Leadership
Grindel, C. G. (2016). Clinical leadership: A call to action. Medsurg Nursing, 25(1), 9–16.
o This article discusses the characteristics—and importance—of nurses who exhibit clinical leadership.
• Morrison, J. (2016). Nursing leadership in ACO payment reform. Nursing Economic$, 34(5), 230–235.
o The effects of health care finance reform on nursing leadership are explored in this paper The Stakeholder Presentation Paper.
Resources: Advocacy and Policy
Advocacy and Policy
• American Nurses Association. (n.d.). Advocacy. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/
o This Web page provides resources and tools to help nurses become competent advocates.
• American Nurses Association. (n.d.). Health policy. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/health-policy/
o This Web page provides links to statements and resources for various health policies relevant to nursing.
• Arms, D., & Stalter, A. M. (2016). Serving on organizational boards: What nurses need to know. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 21(2), D1–D9.
o This article relates an overview of competencies needed by nurses that are developing policy or serving on organizational boards.
• Olson, K. (2016). Influence through policy: Four steps YOU can take. Reflections on Nursing Leadership, 42(2), 1–3. https://www.reflectionsonnursingleadership.org/commentary/more-commentary/Vol42_2_influence-through-policy-four-steps-you-can-take
o This article presents practical steps that nurses can take to develop and influence the direction of health policies The Stakeholder Presentation Paper.
Resources: Human and Financial Resources
Financial Resources
• Buerhaus, P., Skinner, L., Auerbach, D., & Staiger, D. (2017). State of the registered nurse workforce as a new era of health reform emerges. Nursing Economics, 35(5), 229‒237.
o This article presents data regarding the current and projected need for nursing professionals.
• Huckaby, S. (2020). Making the case: The use of Lean Six Sigma methodologies to improve staffing in an acute hemodialysis unit. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 47(5), 457‒461.
o This article reviews a nontraditional way to request additional full-time equivalent employees.
• Olley, R., Edwards, I., Avery, M., & Cooper, H. (2019). Systematic review of the evidence related to mandated nurse staffing ratios in acute care hospitals. Australian Health Review, 43, 288‒293.
o This article provides a summary of available research on nursing staffing methods and relates them to specific measurable outcomes The Stakeholder Presentation Paper
• MacPhee, M., Wagner, J., Udod, S., Berry, L., Perchie, G., & Conway, A. (2020). Using the synergy tool to determine Regina emergency department staffing needs. Nursing Leadership, 33(3), 29‒44.
o This article describes a three-year process that ended with a patient needs assessment tool to create staffing guidelines in an emergency department in Canada.
• Ogundeju, K. (2020). Evaluation of nursing care value: Rhetoric of 21st century nursing frontiers. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 13(2), 1463–1466.
o This article discusses an acceptable way to evaluate the value of nursing care.
Human Resources
• Annis, A. M., Robinson, C. H., Yankey, N., Krein, S. L., Duffy, S. A., Taylor, B., & Sales, A. (2017). Factors associated with the implementation of a nurse staffing directive. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 47(12), 636–644.
o This article may be helpful as you address human resources management in your presentation.
ORDER TODAY
Resources: Evidence-Based Practice
Evidence-Based Practice
• American Journal of Nursing. (n.d.). AJN’s Evidence-based practice series: Step by step. https://www.nursingcenter.com/evidencebasedpracticenetwork/home/tools-resources/collections/ajn-ebp-series.aspx
o This Web page presents resources, articles, and knowledge checks that may be useful to you as you create your presentation or when reviewing EBP concepts The Stakeholder Presentation Paper