Research-Based Practice Model Discussion Paper

Research-Based Practice Model Discussion Paper

Research in healthcare and nursing has been key in advancement, source of knowledge, and new evidence on how to deliver evidence-based and quality care (Cullen et al., 2020). your group’s work has provided a well-organized and detailed analysis or explanation of the Iowa Model. This research-based practice model is founded on practice to enhance the quality of care provided (Duff et al., 2020)Research-Based Practice Model Discussion Paper. I recognize, agree and appreciate your post’s thoroughness in outlining the steps of the Iowa model. There is also clarity regarding the model’s evolution over time and how it has continued to be included in nursing.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Nevertheless, the explanation may be enhanced in a few additional ways. First, in the introduction and context, you have effectively introduced the model, including its purpose. Adding a point or sentence on the model’s importance in contemporary nursing could be a plus for the introduction. Your work is clear under the literature review and evidence section, but it would be better to explain how nurses can validate research relevance. Thirdly, you have done good work in the implementation phase, but including examples of Iowa Mode being used or applied successfully is key to strengthening your point.

Your group has mentioned the heuristic nature of the model. In agreement with this, the heuristic nature has made it easy for the model to be adaptable to diverse healthcare settings (Iowa Model Collaborative et al., 2019)Research-Based Practice Model Discussion Paper. However, you can factor in providing examples in different clinical settings, and the model could easily be applied. When comparing with other models, you can consider using a comparative table, which would visually make it easy for the readers to understand. Other areas in which your post has been excellent include the flow and clarity of the information provided and the effective and right use of citations.

Your group’s work can be regarded as a robust and detailed analysis of the Iowa model, fused with its relevance to the field and application. Factoring the suggested additions, your group can improve content depth and clarity regarding the work presented, making it more impactful and informative for your team members and peers.

References

Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Edmonds, S. W., Reisinger, H. S., & Wagner, M. (2022). Iowa implementation for sustainability framework. Implementation Science, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01157-5

Duff, J., Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., & Steelman, V. (2020). Determinants of an evidence-based Practice environment: an Interpretive Description. Implementation Science Communications, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00070-0 Research-Based Practice Model Discussion Paper

Iowa Model Collaborative, Buckwalter, K. C., Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Kleiber, C., McCarthy, A. M., Rakel, B., Steelman, V., Tripp-Reimer, T., Tucker, S., & Authored on behalf of the Iowa Model Collaborative (2019). Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice: Revisions and Validation. Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 14(3), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12223

Iowa Model Dr Payne-Group 2: Anna Davis, Fatima Cruz, Karen Desir, Rachel Chernyak In the early 1990s, a team of nurses from the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) and College of Nursing devised a framework known as The Iowa Model of Research-Based Practice to Enhance Quality Care (Buckwalter et al., 2017). Its purpose was to assist clinicians in assessing and integrating research findings into patient care. It was crafted by nurses who drew from their successful experiences in research utilization projects. Over time, as research utilization transitioned into Evidence-Based Practice (EBP), incorporating various levels of evidence became paramount. Consequently, the Iowa Model underwent revisions to accommodate this expansion and offer more comprehensive guidance on implementing transformative changes (Buckwalter et al., 2017). The Iowa Model comprises several integral steps to facilitate evidence-based practice. Firstly, it involves the identification of a specific clinical issue necessitating attention (Henson & Jeffrey, 2024). Healthcare professionals systematically review existing literature to unearth pertinent research findings concerning the identified problem. Subsequently, these findings are synthesized and meticulously evaluated to ascertain their validity, relevance, and applicability within the clinical setting. Upon evaluation, strategies are devised to integrate the evidence into clinical practice seamlessly. Implementing evidence-based practice interventions follows suit, marking a pivotal phase. Evaluation of outcomes ensues to gauge the effectiveness of the implemented interventions in addressing the clinical problem. Finally, continuous monitoring and evaluation of outcomes are undertaken to ensure the sustainability and efficacy of evidence-based practices over time (Henson & Jeffrey, 2024). The Iowa Model is notable for its heuristic nature, offering flexibility and adaptability to diverse clinical environments (Tucker et al., 2021)Research-Based Practice Model

ORDER HERE

Discussion Paper. Its comprehensive approach spans problem identification to outcome evaluation, promoting thoroughness and accountability. Moreover, the model prioritizes sustainability through continuous outcome monitoring, ensuring enduring improvements in patient care. Science, philosophical tenets, and EBP models like the Iowa Model have advanced nursing knowledge. EBP models guide nurses in identifying clinical problems, reviewing literature, and implementing evidence-based interventions (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Evidence-based nursing integrates patient needs, practical problem-solving, and nursing expertise (Wang & Ma, 2013). Philosophical tenets, such as ethical and empirical frameworks, ensure patient rights are upheld. Science allows nurses to conduct research and apply findings to practice (Lauzon, 1995). Theories and theorizing are crucial for understanding and implementing EBP models. Theories, grounded in logical positivism, explain why practices are effective (Robinson & Bender, 2023). For instance, the Iowa Model incorporates change management and organizational behavior theories. Theorizing involves developing and refining explanations (Meza et al., 2023). Nurses theorize effective EBP interventions based on new research and clinical experience. The Iowa Model, Stetler Model, and Clinical Scholar Model all focus on integrating research evidence into practice to improve outcomes, offering structured frameworks. Differences include focus areas: the Iowa Model emphasizes organizational change, the Stetler Model targets individual decision-making, and the Clinical Scholar Model develops nurses as EBP leaders (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015)Research-Based Practice Model Discussion Paper.

Iowa Model: Discussion Response (Group II)

Research in healthcare and nursing has been key in advancement, source of knowledge, and new evidence on how to deliver evidence-based and quality care (Cullen et al., 2020). Your group’s work has provided a well-organized and detailed analysis or explanation of the Iowa Model. This research-based practice model is founded on practice to enhance the quality of care provided (Duff et al., 2020). I recognize, agree and appreciate your post’s thoroughness in outlining the steps of the Iowa model. There is also clarity regarding the model’s evolution over time and how it has continued to be included in nursing.

Nevertheless, the explanation may be enhanced in a few additional ways. First, in the introduction and context, you have effectively introduced the model, including its purpose. Adding a point or sentence on the model’s importance in contemporary nursing could be a plus for the introduction. Your work is clear under the literature review and evidence section, but it would be better to explain how nurses can validate research relevance. Thirdly, you have done good work in the implementation phase, but including examples of Iowa Mode being used or applied successfully is key to strengthening your point.

Your group has mentioned the heuristic nature of the model. In agreement with this, the heuristic nature has made it easy for the model to be adaptable to diverse healthcare settings (Iowa Model Collaborative et al., 2019)Research-Based Practice Model Discussion Paper. However, you can factor in providing examples in different clinical settings, and the model could easily be applied. When comparing with other models, you can consider using a comparative table, which would visually make it easy for the readers to understand. Other areas in which your post has been excellent include the flow and clarity of the information provided and the effective and right use of citations.

ORDER NOW

Your group’s work can be regarded as a robust and detailed analysis of the Iowa model, fused with its relevance to the field and application. Factoring the suggested additions, your group can improve content depth and clarity regarding the work presented, making it more impactful and informative for your team members and peers Research-Based Practice Model Discussion Paper