Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix and Summary
Note: This assignment contains two parts: the matrix and the summary.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers. Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Part One: Matrix
Create a matrix of significant legislation affecting health care information systems since the year 2000.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Address, within the matrix, changes based on current influences and challenges to meet legislative expectations.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Insert the matrix as an appendix or within the body of the Summary from Part Two.
Part Two: Summary
Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word summary titled “Summary of Current Government, Legislative, and Regulatory Influences on Information Systems. Include the following in the summary:Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Explain the changing legislative and regulatory rules and their effect on the need to implement e-health clinical and administrative applications in health care organizations.
Assessment of the challenges involved in integrating e-health clinical and administrative applications to meet these expectations.
Trends that were identified in the matrix from part one.
A problem statement based on the legislative trend or trends you identified.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Present the challenges of addressing this trend or trends.
Format the matrix and summary consistent with APA guidelines.
Submit to the Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix and Summary Assignment Files tab.
DHA 723 WEEK 4 Data Collection Presentation
Research the forms of clinical and administrative data used in either your own health care organization or the Moreno Medical Center Virtual Organization.
Create a 14- to 16-slide presentation discussing the various forms of clinical and administrative data collected and used in the organization.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Refer to the University of Phoenix Material: Data Collection Presentation Questions. All question listed in this resource should be addressed in the presentation.
Include detailed speaker notes for all slides in your presentation.
Cite all sources within the slides and speaker notes according to APA guidelines.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Submit to the Assignment Files tab
DHA 723 WEEK 6 Interorganizational Collaboration Paper
Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper delineating how health care organizations do the following:
Develop collaborative strategies predicated upon best practices.
Share lessons learned from failure.
Coordinate resource utilization.
Develop innovative training programs.
Conclude with recommendations for optimizing cooperation between health care organizations based on the course readings and your experience.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Submit to the Assignment Files tab.
The Basel Committee – initially named the Committee on Banking Regulations and Supervisory Practices – was established by the central bank Governors of the Group of Ten countries at the end of 1974 in the aftermath of serious disturbances in international currency and banking markets (notably the failure of Bankhaus Herstatt in West Germany).
The Committee, headquartered at the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, was established to enhance financial stability by improving the quality of banking supervision worldwide, and to serve as a forum for regular cooperation between its member countries on banking supervisory matters. The Committee’s first meeting took place in February 1975, and meetings have been held regularly three or four times a year since.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Since its inception, the Basel Committee has expanded its membership from the G10 to 45 institutions from 28 jurisdictions. Starting with the Basel Concordat, first issued in 1975 and revised several times since, the Committee has established a series of international standards for bank regulation, most notably its landmark publications of the accords on capital adequacy which are commonly known as Basel I, Basel II and, most recently, Basel III.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Laying the foundation: international cooperation between banking supervisors
At the outset, one important aim of the Committee’s work was to close gaps in international supervisory coverage so that (i) no banking establishment would escape supervision; and (ii) supervision would be adequate and consistent across member jurisdictions. A first step in this direction was the paper issued in 1975 that came to be known as the “Concordat”. The Concordat set out principles for sharing supervisory responsibility for banks’ foreign branches, subsidiaries and joint ventures between host and parent (or home) supervisory authorities. In May 1983, the Concordat was revised and re-issued as Principles for the supervision of banks’ foreign establishments.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
In April 1990, a supplement to the 1983 Concordat was issued. This supplement, Exchanges of information between supervisors of participants in the financial markets, aimed to improve the cross-border flow of prudential information between banking supervisors. In July 1992, certain principles of the Concordat were reformulated and published as the Minimum standards for the supervision of international banking groups and their cross-border establishments. These standards were communicated to other banking supervisory authorities, which were invited to endorse them.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
In October 1996, the Committee released a report on The supervision of cross-border banking, drawn up by a joint working group that included supervisors from non-G10 jurisdictions and offshore centres. The document presented proposals for overcoming the impediments to effective consolidated supervision of the cross-border operations of international banks. Subsequently endorsed by supervisors from 140 countries, the report helped to forge relationships between supervisors in home and host countries.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
The involvement of non-G10 supervisors also played a vital part in the formulation of the Committee’s Core principles for effective banking supervision in the following year. The impetus for this document came from a 1996 report by the G7 finance ministers that called for effective supervision in all important financial marketplaces, including those of emerging market economies. When first published in September 1997, the paper set out 25 basic principles that the Basel Committee believed should be in place for a supervisory system to be effective. After several revisions, most recently in September 2012, the document now includes 29 principles, covering supervisory powers, the need for early intervention and timely supervisory actions, supervisory expectations of banks, and compliance with supervisory standards.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Basel I: the Basel Capital Accord
With the foundations for supervision of internationally active banks laid, capital adequacy soon became the main focus of the Committee’s activities. In the early 1980s, the onset of the Latin American debt crisis heightened the Committee’s concerns that the capital ratios of the main international banks were deteriorating at a time of growing international risks. Backed by the G10 Governors, Committee members resolved to halt the erosion of capital standards in their banking systems and to work towards greater convergence in the measurement of capital adequacy. This resulted in a broad consensus on a weighted approach to the measurement of risk, both on and off banks’ balance sheets.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
There was strong recognition within the Committee of the overriding need for a multinational accord to strengthen the stability of the international banking system and to remove a source of competitive inequality arising from differences in national capital requirements. Following comments on a consultative paper published in December 1987, a capital measurement system commonly referred to as the Basel Capital Accord was approved by the G10 Governors and released to banks in July 1988.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
The 1988 Accord called for a minimum ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets of 8% to be implemented by the end of 1992. Ultimately, this framework was introduced not only in member countries but also in virtually all countries with active international banks. In September 1993, the Committee issued a statement confirming that G10 countries’ banks with material international banking business were meeting the minimum requirements set out in the Accord.
The Accord was always intended to evolve over time. It was amended in November 1991 to more precisely define the general provisions or general loan loss reserves that could be included in the capital adequacy calculation. In April 1995, the Committee issued another amendment, to take effect at the end of that year, to recognise the effects of bilateral netting of banks’ credit exposures in derivative products and to expand the matrix of add-on factors. In April 1996, another document was issued explaining how Committee members intended to recognise the effects of multilateral netting.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
The Committee also refined the framework to address risks other than credit risk, which was the focus of the 1988 Accord. In January 1996, following two consultative processes, the Committee issued the Amendment to the Capital Accord to incorporate market risks (or Market Risk Amendment), to take effect at the end of 1997. This was designed to incorporate within the Accord a capital requirement for the market risks arising from banks’ exposures to foreign exchange, traded debt securities, equities, commodities and options. An important aspect of the Market Risk Amendment was that banks were, for the first time, allowed to use internal models (value-at-risk models) as a basis for measuring their market risk capital requirements, subject to strict quantitative and qualitative standards. Much of the preparatory work for the market risk package was undertaken jointly with securities regulators.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Basel II: the new capital framework
In June 1999, the Committee issued a proposal for a new capital adequacy framework to replace the 1988 Accord. This led to the release of a revised capital framework in June 2004. Generally known as “Basel II”, the revised framework comprised three pillars:Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
minimum capital requirements, which sought to develop and expand the standardised rules set out in the 1988 Accord
supervisory review of an institution’s capital adequacy and internal assessment process
effective use of disclosure as a lever to strengthen market discipline and encourage sound banking practices
The new framework was designed to improve the way regulatory capital requirements reflect underlying risks and to better address the financial innovation that had occurred in recent years. The changes aimed at rewarding and encouraging continued improvements in risk measurement and control.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
The framework’s publication in June 2004 followed almost six years of intensive preparation. During this period, the Basel Committee consulted extensively with banking sector representatives, supervisory agencies, central banks and outside observers in order to develop significantly more risk-sensitive capital requirements.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.
Following the June 2004 release, which focused primarily on the banking book, the Committee turned its attention to the trading book. In close cooperation with the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), the international body of securities regulators, the Committee published in July 2005 a consensus document governing the treatment of banks’ trading books under the new framework. For ease of reference, this new text was integrated with the June 2004 text in a comprehensive document released in June 2006: Basel II: International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: A revised framework – Comprehensive version.
Committee members and several non-members agreed to adopt the new rules, albeit on varying timescales. One challenge that supervisors worldwide faced under Basel II was the need to approve the use of certain approaches to risk measurement in multiple jurisdictions. While this was not a new concept for the supervisory community – the Market Risk Amendment of 1996 involved a similar requirement – Basel II extended the scope of such approvals and demanded an even greater degree of cooperation between home and host supervisors. To help address this issue, the Committee issued guidance on information-sharing in 2006, followed by advice on supervisory cooperation and allocation mechanisms in the context of the advanced measurement approaches for operational risk.Historical and Current Legislation Review Matrix Assignment Papers.