NR 505 Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion Assignment Rubric

Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion
Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion
Criteria Ratings Pts

Data Collection

35.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: For quantitative design the required content includes: • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Identify the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic) • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be used to enhance data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative design the required content includes: • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts) • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Explain the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be useful in enhancing data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method

31.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: For quantitative design the required content includes: • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Identify the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic) • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be used to enhance data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative design the required content includes: • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts) • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Explain the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be useful in enhancing data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method

28.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements For quantitative design the required content includes: • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Identify the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic) • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be used to enhance data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative design the required content includes: • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts) • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Explain the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be useful in enhancing data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method

13.0 pts

Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: For quantitative design the required content includes: • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Identify the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic) • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be used to enhance data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative design the required content includes: • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts) • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Explain the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be useful in enhancing data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: For quantitative design the required content includes: • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Identify the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic) • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be used to enhance data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative design the required content includes: • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts) • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Explain the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be useful in enhancing data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
35.0 pts

Analysis

Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

25.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes: • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal • Describe one type of inferential statistics and its use in this EBP proposal • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative data the required content includes: • Explain how data analysis is organized • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method

22.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes: • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal • Describe one type of inferential statistics and its use in this EBP proposal • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative data the required content includes: • Explain how data analysis is organized • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method

20.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes: • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal • Describe one type of inferential statistics and its use in this EBP proposal • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative data the required content includes: • Explain how data analysis is organized • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

10.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: For quantitative data the required content includes: • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal • Describe one type of inferential statistics and its use in this EBP proposal • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative data the required content includes: • Explain how data analysis is organized • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes: • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal • Describe one type of inferential statistics and its use in this EBP proposal • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative data the required content includes: • Explain how data analysis is organized • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
25.0 pts

Evaluation

20.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented

18.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented

16.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented

8.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
20.0 pts

Dissemination of Results

20.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels

18.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels

16.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels

8.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels
20.0 pts

Conclusion

10.0 pts

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting
Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

9.0 pts

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting

8.0 pts

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting

4.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting
10.0 pts

Paper Specifications

10.0 pts

This section included all of the following: • Paper meets length requirements of not exceeding 45pages excluding title and reference pages • Headings are required and listed above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

9.0 pts

This section included three of the following: • Paper meets length requirements of not exceeding 45 pages excluding title and reference pages • Headings are required and listed above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements • . • A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

8.0 pts

This section included only two of the following: • Paper meets length requirements of not exceeding 45 pages excluding title and reference pages • Headings are required and listed above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements • A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

4.0 pts

This section included only one of the following: • Paper meets length requirements of not exceeding 45 pages excluding title and reference pages • Headings are required and listed above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements • A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

0.0 pts

This section included none of the following: • Paper meets length requirements of not exceeding 45pages excluding title and reference pages • Headings are required and listed above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements • Headings are present and consistent with APA format. • A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
10.0 pts

APA Style

10.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings. font, etc.), and reference page • One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present

9.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page • One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 – 3 APA errors were present
Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion

8.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page • One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA were are present

4.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page • One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA were are present

0.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page • One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present
10.0 pts

Citations

10.0 pts

There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.

9.0 pts

There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty.

8.0 pts

There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

4.0 pts

There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

0.0 pts

There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
10.0 pts

Writing Quality

10.0 pts

1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

9.0 pts

3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

8.0 pts

5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

4.0 pts

7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

0.0 pts

9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
10.0 pts
Total Points: 150.0 Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion