Case Study For Patient Diagnosed With Stage 3 Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Case Study For Patient Diagnosed With Stage 3 Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Case Study: A 65-year-old woman was just been diagnosed with Stage 3 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. She was informed of this diagnosis in her primary care physician’s office. She leaves her physician’s office and goes home to review all of her tests and lab results with her family. She goes home and logs into her PHR. She is only able to pull up a portion of her test results. She calls her physician’s office with this concern. The office staff discussed that she had part of her lab work completed at a lab not connected to the organization, part was completed at the emergency room, and part was completed in the lab that is part of the doctor’s office organization. Case Study For Patient Diagnosed With Stage 3 Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
The above scenario might be a scenario that you have commonly worked with in clinical practice. For many reasons, patients often receive healthcare from multiple organizations that might have different systems.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
As you review this scenario, reflect and answer these questions for this discussion.
What are the pros and cons of the situation in the case study?
What safeguards are included in patient portals and PHRs to help patients and healthcare professionals ensure safety?
Do you agree or disagree with the way that a patient obtains Personal Health Records (PHRs)?
What are challenges for patients that do not have access to all of the PHRs? Remember, only portions of the EHRs are typically included in the PHRs.
Your patient has a Personal Health Record: Now What?
The paper aims to address questions linked to the 65-year-old woman’s case scenario with Stage 3 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hence, the main areas to be addressed include the case study situation pros and cons, patient portals and Personal Health Records (PHRs) safeguards and ways patients access the Personal Health Records effectiveness and challenges for patients that cannot access PHRs. Case Study For Patient Diagnosed With Stage 3 Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
The Case Study Situation Pros and Cons
Patients’ health records (PHRs) are an essential healthcare technology integration since they enable patients to access their medical information and make them active in healthcare decisions (Lee et al., 2020). As one of the PHRs advantages, such access for the case study scenario client has easily identified missing information, thus making it easy to enquire about their whereabouts since she wants to understand her Stage 3 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma condition. However, as portrayed in the case scenario, the cons associated with the PHRs are that not all healthcare organizations can access and send patient information electronically, as explained by the physician on why some information is missing (Lee et al., 2020). In such a case, the patient has to update the health information manually, which may lead to errors.
Patient Portals and Personal Health Records (PHRs) Safeguards
The main safeguards associated with patient portals and PHRs lie in ensuring a safe connection, regular password changes, and in other cases, two-factor authentication. Such factors help prevent instances of cybercrimes that can endanger patient information (Lee et al., 2020)Case Study For Patient Diagnosed With Stage 3 Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.
Ways Patients Access the Personal Health Records
I agree with how patients access their healthcare information since it proves to be efficient and effective. That is because patients can easily access their healthcare information anytime and at any place, thus enabling them to manage their health appropriately.
Challenges For Patients That Cannot Access PHRs
The main challenge patients have when they cannot access their PHRs is that they can lose track of their previous tests and treatments, thus losing track of the information that can help in care coordination (Lee et al., 2020). That is unlike the patients that can easily trace their health records which makes care coordination easy.
ORDER HERE
Conclusion
In conclusion, PHRs are crucial since they promote care coordination and error correction if noted within medical records.
Reference
Lee, H.-A., Kung, H.-H., Udayasankaran, J. G., Kijsanayotin, B., B Marcelo, A., Chao, L. R., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2020). An Architecture and Management Platform for Blockchain-Based Personal Health Record Exchange: Development and Usability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e16748. https://doi.org/10.2196/16748 Case Study For Patient Diagnosed With Stage 3 Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma