The Moral And Ethical Of Organ Conscription Assignment

The Moral And Ethical Of Organ Conscription Assignment

Robbing the Dead: Is Organ Conscription Ethical?

The shortage of donor organs is a significant challenge facing the healthcare sector. Consequently, millions of people who need donor organs are losing their lives worldwide.  To address this issue, some individuals propose obtaining organs from dead people as a potential solution. This paper evaluates if getting organs from dead people who cannot give their consent is morally upright or if it’s a way of robbing them.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Is consent ethically required for the Conscription of Cadaveric Organs?

            Obtaining organs from dead people is considered a morally sound decision. This action is ethically sound since the outcome of the acquired organ outweighs the negative impacts of receiving an organ from a dead person. Therefore, obtaining internal organs from dead people who are no longer require them is not a violation of ethical rights. However, consent is needed for some incidents before getting internal organs from dead people. First, consent would be required if an individual had given medical directives on what should be done with the body parts, either through writing or by sharing with family members. Medical directives portray patients’ autonomy and wishes regarding internal organs; hence they deserve respect. Additionally, consent would be needed if one’s religious beliefs or cultural values are against organ conscription. Obtaining an organ from such persons would be acting against their religious beliefs or cultural traditions. Lastly, consent would be required if the family members are against organ conscription. According to Costa-Font et al. (2021)The Moral And Ethical Of Organ Conscription Assignment, relatives’ consent should be considered before obtaining an organ from a dead person if an individual had not issued any medical directives regarding using his internal organs while alive. Thus, consent should be obtained from the family members before getting internal organs from their loved ones.

Is the policy truly just and fair?

The proposed policy of conscription of cadaveric organs is truly just and fair. The supporters of this policy advocate for the removal of internal organs from individuals who have lost their lives recently without first obtaining the consent of the donors or their relatives. Implementing this policy will increase the number of scarce organs. According to Cantarovich (2018)The Moral And Ethical Of Organ Conscription Assignment, barriers hindering organ and tissue transplantation significantly contribute to the death of most individuals who need organ donation. Therefore, implementing a policy of conscription of cadaveric organs will increase the supply of vital internal organs, saving the lives of many individuals who would have died due to a lack of these organs. Additionally, the policy will reduce the number of organs obtained from the living, thus preventing them from the risk of undergoing organ transplantation or death should the left organ fail. For instance, a person who has donated a kidney is at high risk of undergoing kidney transplantation or losing their life should the left kidney fail to function. Lastly, conscription policy will impose the burden of providing organs after death to all individuals to benefit the deceased; hence it is truly fair and just.

Is an Alternative Policy for Increasing Available Donor Organs?

No alternative policies for increasing available donor organs should be considered. Munson (2014) advocated for a policy of conscription of cadaveric organs as a truly just and fair way of increasing the scarce donor organs. This policy is the most effective since obtaining an organ from the deceased won’t affect their health or lives. On the contrary, adopting a policy that advocates for removing donor organs from the living would result in adverse outcomes, including health complications or death, especially among elderly donors. According to Dayoub et al. (2018)The Moral And Ethical Of Organ Conscription Assignment, aging is associated with a higher graft failure risk and patient death in recipients. The policy of conscription of cadaveric organs will ensure organs are obtained from younger people, preventing graft failure and death of the recipient. Thus, the conscription of cadaveric organs is the best policy for increasing the supply of scarce organs.

Overall, obtaining organs from the deceased raises moral and ethical issues. It is morally right to get internal organs from dead people since it will benefit individuals requiring organ transplantation without affecting the donor. However, it is not justified to obtain an internal organ from a deceased person if he or she had given medical directives indicating how organs would be used after death, accepting the organ compromises with donor’s religious beliefs or cultural practices, or will be acting against family’s wishes. The proposed policy of conscription of cadaveric organs is truly fair since it advocates for removing internal organs from the deceased. Thus, no alternative policy should be introduced to replace the policy of conscription of cadaveric organs The Moral And Ethical Of Organ Conscription Assignment.

ORDER TODAY

References

Cantarovich, F. (2018). The society, the barriers to organ donation and alternatives for a change. In Organ Donation and Transplantation-Current Status and Future Challenges. IntechOpen. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.73756

Costa-Font, J., Rudisill, C., & Salcher-Konrad, M. (2021). ‘Relative Consent’or ‘Presumed Consent’? Organ donation attitudes and behaviour. The European Journal of Health Economics, 22(1), 5-16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10198-020-01214-8

Dayoub, J. C., Cortese, F., Anžič, A., Grum, T., & de Magalhães, J. P. (2018). The effects of donor age on organ transplants: A review and implications for aging research. Experimental gerontology, 110, 230-240. Doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.06.019

Munson, R. (2014). Intervention and reflection: basic issues in bioethics (concise ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth The Moral And Ethical Of Organ Conscription Assignment