Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion

Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion

Do take note that the final assignment has some more qualifiers in it to receive full credit. Also, your last assignment was a benchmark assignment and realize that you needed to explain thoroughly, please make sure to try and stay close to the word count. This week it is 1500-2000 words.
You have all done well and I hope this has been a time of stretching, thought, and encouragement. Our world continues to need folks like you who care, who study, and who make a difference each day in the life of others.
In addition to the topic Resources, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Answer the following questions about a patient’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.
1. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale. Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion
2. In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James’s care?
3. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?
Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2
Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups. Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion

Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

First response

Should the doctor respect the patient’s autonomy by letting Mike make decisions that, in his opinion, are unreasonable and detrimental to James? Justify your position.

Respecting patients’ autonomy means honoring their decision as well as their method of decision-making. The doctor should first let Mike make decisions that seem unreasonable and are bad for James. To protect their privacy and dignity, he must adhere to every law, institutional rules, and professional moral code (Feiler et al., 2017). Since James was just a juvenile, Mike also served as the client’s voice in this instance. James was correctly diagnosed, or the doctor recommended the course of therapy he thought was required. Mike made risky decisions out of enthusiasm and ignorance of the consequences. Therefore, it would be wise for the doctor to contact the ethical committee in this instance and find out what might be accomplished further.

According to Shelly et al. (2021), the doctor’s responsibility throughout this situation is vital. The guardians should have as much clarity as possible regarding the medical condition. Now would be the moment for the physician to address Mike regarding his behaviors, further jeopardizing James despite his continued attempts to do the opposite (Shelly et al., 2021). Mike must know James’s sickness severity and the consequences of a delayed kidney transplant. By behaving this way, the physician is not compromising privacy and dignity (Feiler et al., 2017). James is just a tiny kid. Therefore, his parents have a right to choose. The physician appreciated Mike’s decision to bring James to religious therapy instead of the shorter-term dialysis therapy. Nothing in the Scripture implies that Lord disapproved of their use of medical herbs, salves, recommended diets, or even other medical cures. “Healthy individuals wouldn’t need a physician; however, the ill need one,” remarked Jesus. — Matthew 9:12. But even now, despite receiving faith healing, James’ condition did never get better. The child was presented to the physician with the father, who is doing his job by emphasizing the gravity of the condition and the consequences of delaying treatment. The physician has to persuade Mike that he’ll also be thinking about James’ well-being and needs to treat James right away to prevent more harm. A priest or bishop from the family’s religious group who can convince them that James’ medical intervention will not go against their spiritual principles can be helpful at this stage.

The physician must treat Mike with dignity while maintaining his commitment to his heritage, faith, or beliefs. Mike wants to understand that maybe God’s desire and how He wants James to recover is for James to be admitted to the clinic (Feiler et al., 2017)Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion. James’ condition has progressed to the point where his recovery depends on medical attention and God’s favor. Mike has to continue putting his faith in God and praying for James while enduring the necessary medical care.

A range of factors influences people’s choices. Age, faith, society, cognitive biases, prior experience, and other factors might be at play. Doctors should honor their clients’ specific religious and cultural convictions while considering their importance for care and treatment decisions. Conflicts among clinical judgments and client perspectives must be handled cautiously. As health professionals, we are responsible for alerting the proper authorities, like child welfare services, whenever we observe that a parent’s decisions or actions may place a child in danger of death or disability (Feiler et al., 2017). Reporting becomes considerably more challenging when parents behave in a way consistent with their religious and philosophical views rather than with an intent to harm their children. Medical professionals may execute life-saving procedures when a child is in urgent danger, notwithstanding parental misgivings as the declaration has been made.

ORDER HERE

Second response

How ought the Christian think about sickness and health?

Most Christians have a range of perspectives on sickness and suffering. God placed humans as the gem on the pinnacle of His creation so that man may govern and dominate over it. Judging their capacity to rely on him for treatment, their God could be making up their minds to the test. On either side, individuals may feel God will punish them for their sins and attribute disease and misery to sin (Swan, 2020). They sinned, David says in Psalm 107:17 and Psalm 38:3, and sickness followed. By causing physical disease on people’s bodies, God is punishing them for their sin. Christians also consider health to be a blessing from God. He serves as their defender, healer, and source of wellbeing and vitality. Depending upon their beliefs, Christians might respond to disease in ways that exacerbate their health or make them unaware of the need for medical help. Furthermore, several religions are against blood donations or organ donors, including the Jehovah’s Witness faith. Every Christian responds to illness differently, assuming all other factors remain the same Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion.

Many people also abstain from drug use. Christians’ perspectives on medical interventions differ as well. From some views, Christians mistakenly believe they must stop taking their medications and focus only on praying for recovery. God provides medical attention and drugs for specific individuals through physicians, but Him alone is ultimately in control of curing. He is indeed the physician. No matter how successful the doctors are, only God has the power to heal (Lang, 2019). Many Christians share this viewpoint. Many choose to forgo medical treatment in favor of their faith in God’s divine intervention. For healing, certain people ask for prayers for deliverance.

How should a Christian think about medical intervention?

Christians should always seek help from God and seek appropriate medical treatment. The many Christian denominational groups are the foundation for Christian thinking on participation. On this matter, there are primarily two points of view. A group holds that perhaps the best defense against illness is faith, much like James’ parents did. Another group thinks that God sends physicians to help eradicate sickness on earth (Swan, 2020). It is evident from the multiple viewpoints as Christians had different ideas about actions. Jesus was aware that sufferers need medical attention. He did not forbid using “earthly treatments” or medical practitioners. Yes, Jesus performed several healing miracles during his stay on the planet. Yet they helped to some extent to show the general population that Christ was the foretold Messiah (Luke 4:18)Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion. Mike, though, is sure that therapeutic procedure is unnecessary in our circumstances. As James’s dad, he thinks that God can heal James as quickest and also that James doesn’t require medical attention.

What is Mike, a Christian, supposed to do?

According to the Christian perspective, Mike ought to take their son to the doctor while putting his faith in a deity who might see that all procedures go well. He has to keep asking his faithful followers for prayers and showing up for all sermons or fellowships. On either hand, because James needs to receive medical attention at the clinic, attending church might not be necessary (Swan, 2020). He ought to think about the role doctors perform in healthcare. He must consider them his intermediaries, instructing them about how to handle his kid. Mike needs to cease denying the prospect that his second kid will become a donor & start viewing him as a sacred act sent to save the lives of his twins.

To uphold nonmaleficence, Mike must consider James’ life quality, even without a kidney. James’s condition will worsen, and he should not live the recommended twelve months. The brother, Samuel, may endure some suffering but will ultimately save James & heal him (Swan, 2020). Consequently, Mike’s judgments based on the physician’s recommendations will direct his thoughts on how to save his son. Then, Mike would put his faith to use by pleading with God to protect his boys. He will be sure they might heal and lead long, happy lives.

How should he think through his decision to put his confidence in God and care for James in a way that upholds the beneficence and nonmaleficence principles?

Mike has to learn about the beneficence concept. This medical idea contends that all decisions will be made with the patient’s interest in mind by ensuring that the benefits of a treatment regimen outweigh the drawbacks. Even though Mike is not a doctor, he ought to be aware of this idea (Swan, 2020)Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion. On either hand, nonmaleficence dictates that harm to the client must be prevented. Even if he wishes to demonstrate his faith in God, he should realize that counseling is required in this case.

Third response

How could the doctor determine the best course of action for James and his family or other people engaged in his care using a spiritual needs assessment?

Some Christians think that getting medical attention demonstrates a lack of conviction in God. An evaluation of James’ religious requirements will reveal that his family is adopting a Christian worldview. The degree of care provided at the hospital dramatically influences the child’s views. Religious views have a significant role in defining the patient’s condition and driving care decisions. Religious ideas guide the patient’s nonmaleficence or beneficence. Mike should make a decision demonstrating his total belief in God (Hoffarth, 2020)Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion. The parents, relatives, and churchgoers only use medication to stop death. This may be witnessed in how many people came to donate a kidney for James upon learning of his situation.

To ascertain the impact of Mike & his wife’s faith on medical treatment, the doctor should evaluate them spiritually. Mike’s choice of religious beliefs above medical care, especially after intercessory prayer failed the first time, raises the alarm. The doctor should ascertain Mike’s perspective on Christianity with medical care and what his son’s illness means to him (Hoffarth, 2020). Any worries Mike might have about his son’s medical attention at this time must be addressed by a priest or pastor, ideally from Mike’s church.

Whenever a person is ill, their religious needs are crucial and impact their decision-making capacity. Individuals may think pain should be accepted and reduced whenever possible rather than eliminated based on how they view health and life. A religious diagnostic tool called Hope questions patients about their sources for hope, their affiliation with a particular religion, and their spiritual activities and views (Hoffarth, 2020)Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion. What effect their faith might have on care decisions & final disposition. The clinicians are guided by this inquiry from broad concepts to precise applications. It evaluates a patient’s requirements, hopes, or resources to identify what treatments would aid recovery.

It’s also important to consider how he put his son’s health at risk by exaggerating his trust in God. A critical evaluation of his understanding of Christian doctrine and the role of medical care is also necessary. If someone likes to have to prove his dedication twice, he could be a devoted follower of Christianity. Being a Christian is one thing, but to be unaffected or unaffected by the probable loss of his son is a more significant concern. His Christian values are pretty substantial (Hoffarth, 2020)Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion. He might be discouraged from it by opposing perspectives in addition to the desire to display his beliefs. After a checkup, it becomes much easier to help him, and his family discovers assistance for his son.

In summary, Mike and the entire family are going through a challenging moment in their lives and are torn between choosing medical care for their son’s condition against spiritual healing. They believe that by selecting medical care, they are being disobedient to God. They require all the assistance they can get, including religious aid, to make a choice.

References

Feiler, T., Gaitskell, K., Maughan, T., & Hordern, J. (2017). Personalized medicine: the promise, the hype, and the pitfalls. The New Bioethics, 23(1), 1-12.

Hoffarth, A. P. (2020). A study of physician preparedness about religious diversification: an examination of policy, education, training, and experience.

Lang, S.J (2019). Spiritual Life: What Does the Bible Say About Sickness and Healing?

Shelly, J. A., Miller, A. B., & Fenstermacher, K. H. (2021). We are called to care: A Christian vision for nursing. InterVarsity Press.

Swan, R. (2020). Faith-Based Medical Neglect: for Providers and Policymakers. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 13(3), 343-353. Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion

First response

Should the doctor respect the patient’s autonomy by letting Mike make decisions that, in his opinion, are unreasonable and detrimental to James? Justify your position.

Respecting patients’ autonomy means honoring their decision as well as their method of decision-making. The doctor should just let Mike take actions that seem unreasonable and are bad for James. To protect their privacy and dignity, he must adhere to every law, institutional rules, and professional moral code (Feiler et al., 2017). Since James was just a juvenile, Mike also served as the client’s voice in this instance. James was correctly diagnosed, or the doctor recommended the course of therapy he thought was required. Mike made risky decisions out of enthusiasm and ignorance of the consequences. Therefore, it would be wise for the doctor to contact the ethical committee in this instance and find out what might be accomplished further.

According to Shelly et al. (2021), the doctor’s responsibility throughout this situation is vital. The guardians should have as much clarity as possible regarding the medical condition. Now would be the moment for the physician to address Mike regarding his behaviors, further jeopardizing James despite his continued attempts to do the opposite (Shelly et al., 2021). Mike must know James’s sickness severity and the consequences of a delayed kidney transplant. By behaving this way, the physician is not compromising privacy and dignity (Feiler et al., 2017)Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion. James is just a tiny kid. Therefore, his parents have a right to choose. The physician appreciated Mike’s decision to bring James to religious therapy instead of the shorter-term dialysis therapy. Nothing in the Scripture implies that Lord disapproved of their use of medical herbs, salves, recommended diets, or even other medical cures. “Healthy individuals wouldn’t need a physician; however, the ill need one,” remarked Jesus. — Matthew 9:12. But even now, despite receiving faith healing, James’ condition did never get better. The child was presented to the physician with the father, who is doing his job by emphasizing the gravity of the condition and the consequences of delaying treatment. The physician has to persuade Mike that he’ll also be thinking about James’ well-being and needs to treat James right away to prevent more harm. A priest or bishop from the family’s religious group who can convince them that James’ medical intervention will not go against their spiritual principles can be helpful at this stage.

Second response

How ought the Christian think about sickness and health?

Many people also abstain from drug use. Christians’ perspectives on medical interventions differ as well. From some views, Christians mistakenly believe they must stop taking their medications and focus only on praying for recovery. God provides medical attention and drugs for specific individuals through physicians, but Him alone is ultimately in control of curing. He is indeed the physician. No matter how successful the doctors are, only God has the power to heal (Lang, 2019)Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion. Many Christians share this viewpoint. Many choose to forgo medical treatment in favor of their faith in God’s divine intervention. For healing, certain people ask for prayers for deliverance.

How should a Christian think about medical intervention?

Christians should always seek help from God and seek appropriate medical treatment. The many Christian denominational groups are the foundation for Christian thinking on participation. On this matter, there are primarily two points of view. A group holds that perhaps the best defense against illness is faith, much like James’ parents did. Another group thinks that God sends physicians to help eradicate sickness on earth (Swan, 2020). It is evident from the multiple viewpoints as Christians had different ideas about actions. Jesus was aware that sufferers need medical attention. He did not forbid using “earthly treatments” or medical practitioners. Yes, Jesus performed several healing miracles during his stay on the planet. Yet they helped to some extent to show the general population that Christ was the foretold Messiah (Luke 4:18). Mike, though, is sure that therapeutic procedure is unnecessary in our circumstances. As James’s dad, he thinks that God can heal James as quickest and also that James doesn’t require medical attention.

What is Mike, a Christian, supposed to do?

According to the Christian perspective, Mike ought to take their son to the doctor while putting his faith in a deity who might see that all procedures go well. He has to keep asking his faithful followers for prayers and showing up for all sermons or fellowships. On either hand, because James needs to receive medical attention at the clinic, attending church might not be necessary (Swan, 2020)Case Analysis Of Patient Spiritual Needs Discussion. He ought to think about the role doctors perform in healthcare. He must consider them his intermediaries, instructing them about how to handle his kid. Mike needs to cease denying the prospect that his second kid will become a donor & start viewing him as a sacred act sent to save the lives of his twins.

How should he think through his decision to put his confidence in God and care for James in a way that upholds the beneficence and nonmaleficence principles?

Mike has to learn about the beneficence concept. This medical idea contends that all decisions will be made with the patient’s interest in mind by ensuring that the benefits of a treatment regimen outweigh the drawbacks. Even though Mike is not a doctor, he ought to be aware of this idea (Swan, 2020). On either hand, nonmaleficence dictates that harm to the client must be prevented. Even if he wishes to demonstrate his faith in God, he should realize that counseling is required in this case.

Third response

How could the doctor determine the best course of action for James and his family or other people engaged in his care using a spiritual needs assessment?

Whenever a person is ill, their religious needs are crucial and impact their decision-making capacity. Individuals may think pain should be accepted and reduced whenever possible rather than eliminated based on how they view health and life. A religious diagnostic tool called Hope questions patients about their sources for hope, their affiliation with a particular religion, and their spiritual activities and views (Hoffarth, 2020). What effect their faith might have on care decisions & final disposition. The clinicians are guided by this inquiry from broad concepts to precise applications. It evaluates a patient’s requirements, hopes, or resources to identify what treatments would aid recovery.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

ORDER HERE

ORDER TODAY