Case Study For Qualitative Evidence Journal Entry Assignment

Case Study For Qualitative Evidence Journal Entry Assignment

Susan is a neonatal ICU nurse in a large, inner-city hospital. A fair percentage of their patients are substance-exposed babies born to drug-dependent moms. In spite of her personal beliefs about drug-dependent women parenting, she is committed to providing optimal care to both moms and their babies to try to optimize outcomes. One day, as Susan and her colleague were talking about their particularly challenging shift in the break room, they start to wonder how care providers’ own attitudes and beliefs impact care. They decide to engage in an EBP project to see whether there is a body of literature around this topic. They start with creating a PICOT question to provide key words to search the databases with.

Using the Meaning PICOT question template, they form the following PICOT question: How do neonatal ICU nurses (P) caring for substance-exposed babies and their moms (I) perceive the impact of their attitudes on quality of care (O) (no T [time] needed for this question)? Case Study For Qualitative Evidence Journal Entry Assignment

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Upon searching the literature using the key words from their PICOT question, the nurses discover a handful of articles that address their clinical inquiry. In order to decide whether the articles should be included in their body of evidence, they must critically appraise them. The first article they choose to appraise is Fraser, J. A., Barnes, M., Biggs, H.C., & Kain, V. J. (2007). Caring, chaos and the vulnerable family: Experiences in caring for newborns of drug-dependent parents. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(8), 1363-1370. In the abstract, the authors state, “This study used interpretive methods by conducting group interviews with eight neonatal nurses in each of four Special Care Nursery Units in South-East Queensland, Australia.”

 

QUESTIONS:
Looking at the article title and the quote from the abstract, what type of study do you believe the Frasier et al. (2007) study is? What brought you to that idea?

When critically appraising a qualitative study, we are appraising to see if the study is trustworthy (Lincoln and Guba, 1985)Case Study For Qualitative Evidence Journal Entry Assignment. What does it mean when a study is “trustworthy”? What criteria are used to assess trustworthiness?

Qualitative studies are listed below all the types of quantitative studies on the levels of evidence hierarchy: qualitative studies are either at a Level V, for a systematic analysis of group of qualitative studies, or Level VI, for a singular qualitative study, versus quantitative methodologies ranked at Levels I-IV. This can sometimes give the impression that qualitative evidence is of lesser value. What value does qualitative evidence bring to a body of evidence?

Qualitative Journal Entry

A qualitative research study’s nature of the phenomena focuses on understanding perception, thoughts, meaning, experiences, and thoughts. It justifies or explains the occurrence of a phenomenon. It collects data through observations, images, words, texts, photographs, document reviews, and interviews. There are types of qualitative research approaches like ethnography, phenomenology, narrative research, and grounded theory (Collingridge, D. S., & Gantt, E. E. 2019)Case Study For Qualitative Evidence Journal Entry Assignment. Ethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher is immersed in the participant’s social and cultural environment to learn their behavior and actions. Grounded theory is inductive and aims at studying social interactions and experiences to explain why and how people behave in a certain way. Phenomenology is a qualitative study design that investigates the experience from an individual perspective to understand why they behave in a certain way. Narrative research is a qualitative study method in which the researcher tells a story from the perspective of those involved in it.

The Type Of Study In The Article

Frasier et al, 2007 is an article that describes the experiences of neonatal nurses in providing care to drug-exposed newborns and their parents throughout treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome. The method of study includes group interviews. The researcher has used phenomenological qualitative study design because he uses the nurse’s experiences to describe the perception of patients of drugs. The study methods are participant observations and group interviews that give a powerful understanding and insights into people’s actions, motivation, and conventional wisdom. Case Study For Qualitative Evidence Journal Entry Assignment

Critically Appraising Qualitative Data

The authenticity of a research paper is determined by the title, keywords, authors, abstract, problem and research question, literature, sampling, theoretical framework, methodology, and data collection method. The problem of the study should have a specific research question t justify the purpose of the study. The literature review should be summarized and linked to the study to give a balanced view of what is written on the subject. The theoretical frameworks help in understanding the investigated topic. It provides a rationale and develops the research question or statement. These are identified in the research by Frasier et al 2007 because it has a research question with a theoretical framework, methodology, and keywords. However, there is no literature review or sampling method provided by the researcher. The research is good because of the author’s credentials. The study method and study findings are credible. The setting of the research reflects the context of the research topic and study method. The interviews were done with neonatal nurses taking care of children abandoned by mothers who are drug addicts. A good research paper should have ethical considerations and approval from the relevant participants. In this study, the author has no proof of seeking consent from the participants. Additionally, there is no proof of good ethical practice while carrying out the study. The ethical issue observed was the discrimination of the mothers against the children because they were not involved in the study. Case Study For Qualitative Evidence Journal Entry Assignment

Trustworthiness Of The Article

Trustworthiness is the ability of the researcher to establish study findings as credible, transferable, and confirmable. Trustworthiness helps other people to utilize it to form a public policy, and use it to guide individual choice, and community action. The article by Frasier is not credible, confirmable, and transferable because there was no systemic explanation of data analysis that derived the results or the conclusion of the study.

 References

Collingridge, D. S., & Gantt, E. E. (2019). Republished: The quality of qualitative research. American Journal of Medical Quality, 34(5), 439-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860619873187 Case Study For Qualitative Evidence Journal Entry Assignment

ORDER TODAY

Journal Grading Rubric

NURS 6103 Research Design & Methodology

 

Criteria	Excellent	Acceptable	Unacceptable
Coverage of Content (30%)	(30 points) Response to assigned topic thorough and well-written, with varied sentence structure and vocabulary; opinions always supported with facts from the literature. Two recent (within past 5 years) citatons in APA format referenced.	(15-29 points) Response thoughtful and fairly well written; most opinions supported with facts from the literature. Less than two citations and/or citations older than 5 years.	(0-14 points) Response consists of unsupported opinions only marginally related to the topic.
Organized Progression and Idea Development (30%)	(30 ponts) Writing is comprehensible and concise. Use of examples. Word count over 200.	(15-29 points) Writing is somewhat comprehensible is somewhat organized. Some reliance on examples. Word count 100-200.	(0-14 points) Writing is difficult to follow and is disorganized. No examples used. Word count less than 100.
Synthesis of Ideas (30%)	(30 points) Clear analysis and synthesis presented; demonstrates insight into the identified problem; conclusions strongly supported.	(15-29 points) Some analysis and synthesis of ideas; discussed the history and relationships among key points found in the literature.	(0-14 points) Did not attempt to synthesize the information or discuss the topic in the broader context of the scholarly literature.
Mechanics/Grammar (15%)	(15 points) Free of errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling.	(8-14 points) 1-4 errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling.	(0-7 points) 5 or more errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling.
APA Format (15%)	(15 points) Free of errors in APA formatting, including spacing, margins, headings, in-text citations, reference page, etc.	8-14 points) 1-4 errors in APA formatting, including spacing, margins, headings, in-text citations, reference page, etc.	0-7 points) 5 or more errors in APA formatting, including spacing, margins, headings, in-text citations, reference page, etc.

 Case Study For Qualitative Evidence Journal Entry Assignment