Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper
Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper
In order to help you become more familiar with some of the current areas of concern to psychology and the law, you are required to develop an argumentative paper on a topic from the list below. Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper. Your argument s in the paper will be either entirely based on the support of the idea raised in the topic or your paper will be entirely designed to refute the idea raised in the topic. While 2 students will be allowed to have the same topic, only 1 of them will develop an argumentative paper that supports the topic while the other develops a paper that refutes the topic. However, each student is entirely responsible for developing their own paper as this is an individual based activity.Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Specifically, your paper should adhere to the areas of content contained in the rubric detailed below. Argumentative papers should be at least 2 pages long (double space) but not exceed 4 pages. However, you should not limit yourself to the “least” page requirement unless you are certain that you have completed and clearly addressed all the elements of the paper contained in the rubric. Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper. Papers should use 12 font and follow appropriate and required elements of APA documentation with both in text citations and an APA formatted reference page should be included in the assignment though it does not count in the minimum number of pages. Sources should be comprised from at least 2 areas: 1 scholarly journal article, and at least two additional sources taken from either an official governmental or private agency’s on line site (i.e, National Institutes of Health, the Cleveland Clinic); and electronic/ print newspaper or magazine articles (i.e, New York Times, US Weekly, Washington Post, US News & World Report). A text book or other book written by experts may also be used. However you are NOT allowed to use the course’s text book as one of the two sources for this paper. The course text book could be used if it is the 3rd source for this paper and does not account for a substantial amount of the citations or direct quotes used to support your response. Students should have their sources cleared by the course instructor if they are unsure of the quality of the source. Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper. ABSOLUTELY NO SOURCES should be taken from Wikipedia, or any gossip magazine. Finally, your paper should have an APA formatted title page. The title page does not counts as one of the two minimum pages needed for this assignment on Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper.
The topics from which you will select to either develop a supportive argument or an argument that refutes the premise of the topic are as follows:Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper
Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper
- Decisions by Jurors assigned to a criminal court case should (should not) always have to be unanimous.
Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper
| Categories and Totals | Excellent 10 points | Acceptable 7 points | Needs Improvement 4 points | Unacceptable 1 point |
| Content | ||||
| Thesis | A clear and concise thesis is present. The thesis is original and interesting. The thesis is clearly argumentative. | A clear thesis is present, but no single statement occurs. The thesis is worth considering. The thesis is clearly argumentative. | A thesis is discernible, but must be articulated by the reader. The thesis is obvious and not worth the time. | There is no thesis. |
| Premises | The main premises are all clear and quantifiable. Examples are interesting. Sub-arguments are present. The sub-premises are clear and quantifiable. | The main premises are all clear and quantifiable. Examples are germane. Generally, sub-arguments are vague or non-existent. | The main premises are present, but readers must articulate them. Examples are present but commonplace. | No premises are present. The paper only paraphrases the thesis. |
| Support | The main premises clearly support the thesis. The sub-premises clearly support the sub-thesis. The argument is valid or inductively strong. The writer commits no logical fallacies | The premises support the thesis, but the support is sometimes weak. The argument is valid or inductively weak. Logical fallacies may be present. | The premises may not always be germane to the thesis. The argument is invalid or inductively weak. Logical fallacies may be present. | The premises are not germane to the thesis. The writer has little understanding of argumentation. |
| Ideas | The writer presents a thoughtful and careful position. The writer has developed the idea. | The writer presents a thoughtful position, but has not developed the idea completely. | The writer presents a position, but does not develop it. | There are no main ideas present in the paper. |
| Use of Sources & APA format | The writer has paraphrased sources accurately, and uses textual support. Using APA format, the writer has fully given appropriate credit in text to sources used and those credits are accurately reflected on an APA formatted reference page. | The writer has paraphrased sources fairly accurately and uses textual support. Using APA format, the writer has given some credit in text (at least 75% of the time) to sources used and those credits are accurately reflected on an APA formatted reference page.Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper | The writer has paraphrased sources fairly accurately, but the sources are weak. The writer has not consistently used APA format to document sources used and any credits to sources used are not accurately reflected on APA format either in text or on the reference page. | The writer has paraphrased sources inaccurately and without concern for textual support. The author has not used APA format to document sources used and/or sources used are not accurately reflected of APA format either in text or on the reference page. |
| Organization | Excellent | Acceptable | Needs Improvement | Unacceptable |
| Introduction | The introduction states the issue concisely with a recognizable argumentative position. | The introduction states the issue with some lack of clarity. There is a recognizable argumentative position.Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper | The introduction is too vague. Readers must articulate the writer’s position. | The introduction does not clearly state an issue or arrive at a position. |
| Body | The argument is explicit and easy to follow. New premises are announced and introduced in separate paragraphs. | The argument is more or less explicit. New premises are usually introduced in new paragraphs. | The argument is difficult to follow. New premises are introduced but haphazardly presented. | The argument is impossible to follow. |
| Conclusion | The writer has clearly chosen a particular type of conclusion: it briefly anticipates the argument’s implications. | The writer summarizes the argument.Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper | The writer simply paraphrases the introduction. | The writer may well have forgotten a conclusion or simply attaches a final sentence or two. |
| Style | Excellent | Acceptable | Needs Improvement | Unacceptable |
| Grammar and Spelling | The writer makes no mistakes in grammar and spelling. | The writer makes an occasional grammar or spelling mistake.Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper | The writer makes careless grammar and spelling mistakes. | The writer makes grammar and spelling mistakes that indicate unfamiliarity with traditional practice. |
| Punctuation | The writer makes no mistakes in punctuation. | The writer makes an occasional punctuation mistake. | The writer makes careless punctuation mistakes. | The writer has no familiarity with traditional punctuation practice. |
Student’s Name_______________ Topic___________________
Total Points: ____________/100
ic Psychology Argumentative Paper. Forensic Psychology Argumentative Paper